⌘+K

Pulse Explore Communities Researchers Journals

Home Communities Explore

October 1, 2010Ethics Place & Environment

NIMBY Claims, Free Riders and Universalisability

G. K. D. Crozier Christopher Hajzler

View at Publisher

Ask AI

Bookmark

Share

Abstract

In ‘Why not NIMBY?’, Simon Feldman and Derek Turner mount a compelling case that NIMBY (Not In My Back Yard) claims are not intrinsically morally unjustified, despite the fact that NIMBY-claimants ...

Discussion

No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.

Cite This Study

Crozier et al. (2010) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6aa5c3cebc2c7db7488e4cc8 https://doi.org/10.1080/1366879x.2010.528626

View at Publisher

Ask AI

Bookmark

Share

Keep reading

Synapse has enriched 5 related papers. Consider them for comparative context:

1Why Not NIMBY?Original Research · 2010 · 33 citations
2The Importance of Nature, Green Spaces, and Gardens in Human Well-BeingEthics Place & Environment · Fri,
3Anne Frank's Tree: Thoughts on Domination and the Paradox of ProgressEthics Place & Environment · Fri,
4A Call for Clarity and a Review of the Empirical Evidence: Comment on Felman and Turner's ‘Why Not NIMBY?’Ethics Place & Environment · Fri,
5NIMBY and the Ethics of the ParticularEthics Place & Environment · Fri,

More from Ethics Place & Environment

Ethical doings in natureculturesTue,
Place Geography and the Ethics of Care: Introductory Remarks on the Geographies of Ethics, Responsibility and CareTue,
Some problems and possibilities of caringTue,
When foods become animals: Ruminations on Ethics and Responsibility in Care-fullpractices of consumptionTue,
Climate Policy is Dead, Long Live Climate Politics!Tue,