Key result
Ticagrelor or prasugrel linked to ~104% higher risk of any bleeding vs clopidogrel post-PCI.
Why the study?
The impact of antiplatelet therapy with availability of CYP2C19 genotyping on bleeding in a real-world setting had not been extensively studied.
Does ticagrelor or prasugrel increase bleeding risk compared to clopidogrel in post-PCI patients?
Cohort (n=2,091)
No
Does ticagrelor or prasugrel increase bleeding risk compared to clopidogrel in post-PCI patients?
Hazard Ratio: 2.04 (95% CI 1.69–2.46)
In post-PCI patients, high-potency P2Y12 inhibitors are associated with a higher risk of bleeding compared to clopidogrel, particularly in non-carriers of CYP2C19 no-function alleles.
May warrant bleeding-focused P2Y12 selection post-PCI; leaves open confirmation in randomized trials.
Purpose: The impact of antiplatelet therapy with availability of CYP2C19 genotyping on bleeding in a real-world setting has not been extensively studied. Methods: Prospective, single-center, cohort study conducted between December 2015 and October 2019 with 1-year follow-up. Patients underwent percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI), CYP2C19 genotyping, and received P2Y12 inhibitor therapy. The primary outcome was time to first bleed of any severity using Bleeding Academic Research Consortium criteria. Secondary outcomes included time to first major bleed and rates of antiplatelet switching. Results: The primary outcome occurred in 697 of 2091 (33%) participants at a median of 15 days. Major bleeding occurred in 176 (8%) of patients. Compared to clopidogrel, treatment with ticagrelor or prasugrel was associated with increased risk of any bleeding (adjusted HR [aHR] 2.04, 95% CI 1.69-2.46). For patients without CYP2C19 no function alleles, treatment with prasugrel or ticagrelor was associated with increased risk of any bleeding (aHR 2.31, 95% CI 1.83-2.90). Similar associations were observed for major bleeding. No difference in ischemic events was observed. Among patients discharged on ticagrelor or prasugrel, 199 (36%) were de-escalated to clopidogrel within 1 year. De-escalation was more likely after a bleed if patients did not have a no function allele (35.9% vs 19.1%; P = .02). Conclusion: Bleeding is common in post-PCI patients on antiplatelet therapy. Patients on high potency agents had higher bleeding risk in the population at-large and in non-carriers of CYP2C19 no function alleles. Genotype-guided antiplatelet de-escalation should be further explored in prospective studies.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Coons et al. (2022) conducted a cohort in Post-PCI patients on antiplatelet therapy (n=2,091). Ticagrelor or prasugrel vs. Clopidogrel was evaluated on Time to first bleed of any severity using Bleeding Academic Research Consortium criteria (aHR 2.04, 95% CI 1.69-2.46). Compared to clopidogrel, treatment with ticagrelor or prasugrel was associated with an increased risk of any bleeding in post-PCI patients (aHR 2.04; 95% CI 1.69-2.46).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: