Key result
Treatment effect on mortality was the most frequently identified main model driver across 72 decision analytic models evaluating the cost-effectiveness of pharmacological interventions for heart failure.
Why the study?
Various decision analytic models evaluate the cost-effectiveness of pharmacological interventions for HF, but studies exploring drivers influencing these modeling approaches remain scarce.
Systematic Review (n=72)
Treatment effect on mortality, cost of treatment, and utility are the most critical drivers of cost-effectiveness models for heart failure pharmacological therapies.
Mortality assumptions require rigorous validation in heart failure cost-effectiveness models; guides parameter prioritization for future pharmacoeconomic research.
Various decision analytic models exist for evaluating the cost-effectiveness of pharmacological interventions for heart failure (HF). Despite this, studies that explore drivers influencing these modeling approaches remain scarce. Through a systematic review of the literature, the present study sought to identify model drivers that emerge from economic evaluations of HF pharmacological interventions. Among the 72 cost effectiveness papers evaluating HF drug interventions, the most frequently identified, top 5 ranked model drivers impacting the incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) were cost of treatment and utility, identified in 10% of studies, respectively. Other drivers that emerged as top 5 ranked drivers in > 5% of studies included treatment effect on mortality (or cardiovascular mortality), duration of treatment, and baseline cardiovascular mortality. Model drivers reported at the top of tornado diagrams were treatment effect on mortality or on cardiovascular mortality. Collectively, these observations highlight the key importance of treatment effect in driving cost-effectiveness models for HF.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Tanna et al. (2019) conducted a systematic review in Heart failure (n=72). Pharmacological treatments was evaluated on Key model drivers impacting the incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER). Treatment effect on mortality was the most frequently identified main model driver across 72 decision analytic models evaluating the cost-effectiveness of pharmacological interventions for heart failure.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: