Key result
Direct children's hospital assessment is linked to shorter ER-to-OR times for pediatric appendicitis versus outside transfers.
Why the study?
What are the process metrics and outcomes for treating pediatric appendicitis in a large geographical area?
Cohort
What are the process metrics and outcomes for treating pediatric appendicitis in a large geographical area?
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
A clinical pathway for pediatric appendicitis may be needed to address process challenges and maintain an acceptable perforation rate.
BACKGROUND: A large service and distant geographical area can make the process of diagnosing and treating appendicitis a challenge. METHODS: Hospital records of children treated for appendicitis between 2007 and 2009 were retrospectively analyzed, including time from emergency (ER) to operating room (OR), diagnostic imaging (DI) utilization, preoperative antibiotic usage, operating time, length of stay (LOS), and perforation rate. RESULTS: The perforation rate was 34%, with longer LOS. Transfer time to the children's hospital between ER inside and outside the city was not different. ER to OR time was significantly shorter for patients assessed at the children's hospital directly. Ultrasound remained the most used DI modality (55%). Preoperative antibiotics were only fully administered in 42% of the cases. CONCLUSION: A clinical pathway for pediatric appendicitis may address the challenges of the process of pre-ER, ER to OR, and OR care to maintain an acceptable perforation rate.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Chiu et al. (2011) conducted a cohort in Pediatric appendicitis. Direct assessment at children's hospital vs. Assessment at outside emergency room was evaluated on Time from emergency room to operating room. Direct assessment at the children's hospital resulted in significantly shorter emergency room to operating room times compared to outside transfers for pediatric appendicitis.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: