Key result
Simplified perfusion technique for minimally invasive valve procedures shows 0 technical complications.
Why the study?
Is a simplified perfusion technique safe and feasible in patients undergoing minimally invasive valve procedures?
Observational (n=200)
Is a simplified perfusion technique safe and feasible in patients undergoing minimally invasive valve procedures?
A simplified perfusion technique using direct aortic cannulation and percutaneous femoral venous drainage is safe and feasible for minimally invasive valve procedures.
In this paper, we present, in detail, the simplified perfusion technique that we have adopted since January 2009 and that we have utilized in 200 cases for cardiac minimally invasive valvular procedures that were performed through a right lateral mini-thoracotomy in the 3(rd)-4(th) intercostal space. Cardiopulmonary bypass was achieved by means of the direct cannulation of the ascending aorta and the insertion of a percutaneous venous cannula in the femoral vein. A flexible aortic cross-clamp was applied through the skin incision and cardioplegic arrest was obtained with the antegrade delivery of a crystalloid solution. Gravity drainage was enhanced by vacuum-assisted aspiration. There were no technical complications related to this perfusion technique that we have adopted in minimally invasive surgical procedures.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Jong et al. (2014) conducted an observational in Cardiac minimally invasive valvular procedures (n=200). Simplified perfusion technique was evaluated on Technical complications. A simplified perfusion technique for minimally invasive valvular procedures resulted in no technical complications across 200 cases.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: