Key result
RV pacing prolongs transmural activation by ~17 ms versus sinus rhythm, unlike LV septal pacing.
Why the study?
Does pacing from different sites alter temporospatial LV transmyocardial activation compared to normal sinus rhythm in mongrel dogs?
Does pacing from different sites alter temporospatial LV transmyocardial activation compared to normal sinus rhythm in mongrel dogs?
Absolute Event Rate: 23% vs 6.1%
p-value: p=<0.05
LV septal pacing, unlike RV endocardial or biventricular pacing, preserves transmyocardial activation patterns similar to normal sinus rhythm in a canine model.
LV septal pacing may preserve physiologic activation better than RV endocardial pacing in models; leaves open translation to human device therapy.
AIMS: Previous studies showed that right ventricular (RV) endocardial pacing can be deleterious even in individuals with initially normal left ventricular (LV) function. The mechanism(s) by which RV endocardial pacing may cause LV dysfunction is unknown. This study compares the temporospatial LV transmyocardial activation profiles during sinus rhythm with normal His/Purkinje conduction vs. currently utilized and proposed cardiac pacing sites. METHODS AND RESULTS: Mongrel dogs were instrumented with transmural electrodes that tracked transmyocardial activation sequences at five sites in the LV. Pacing/recording catheters were positioned in the RV apex and on the RV and LV sides of the ventricular septum. An epicardial pacing electrode was also sewn to the mid-lateral LV epicardium. Electrograms were recorded during sinus rhythm and pacing from the RV endocardium, LV septum, LV epicardium and during biventricular pacing. Compared to normal sinus/His/Purkinje rhythm (NSR), RV endocardial pacing significantly (P < 0.05) prolonged transmural activation (NSR endocardium 6.1 +/- 1 ms vs. RV endocardium 23.0 +/- 2.6 ms). The highly ordered temporospatial pattern of transmural activation during sinus rhythm was replaced with dispersion and intermingling of endo-, mid-, and epicardial activation. LV epicardial and biventricular pacing did not correct these abnormalities. Only LV septal pacing achieved the transmural and transseptal activation sequences similar to sinus rhythm. CONCLUSION: Clinically utilized pacing modalities, including biventricular pacing, cause abnormal transmyocardial activation. LV septal pacing results in transmyocardial activation patterns that closely resemble those seen in sinus rhythm.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Kavanagh et al. (2007) studied this question. Right ventricular endocardial pacing vs. Normal sinus/His/Purkinje rhythm was evaluated on Transmural activation time (p=<0.05). Right ventricular endocardial pacing significantly prolonged transmural activation compared to normal sinus rhythm (23.0 vs 6.1 ms, P<0.05), whereas LV septal pacing closely resembled sinus rhythm.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: