Key result
Fast spatial tapping is linked to greater motor activity while spontaneous pacing loads prefrontal processes.
Why the study?
Little is known regarding the brain areas underlying the temporal control of voluntary actions, partly because traditional neuroimaging techniques are highly sensitive to movement.
Observational (n=16)
This study demonstrates that different motor pacing tempi recruit distinct brain regions, with fast pacing relying more on motor areas and spontaneous pacing on posterior prefrontal processes.
Pacing speed differentially recruits motor vs prefrontal networks; leaves open relevance to motor rehabilitation or disorders.
People are able to modify the spontaneous pace of their actions to interact with their environment and others. This ability is underpinned by high-level cognitive functions but little is known in regard to the brain areas that underlie such temporal control. A salient practical issue is that current neuroimaging techniques (e.g., EEG, fMRI) are extremely sensitive to movement, which renders challenging any investigation of brain activity in the realm of whole-body motor paradigms. Within the last decade, the noninvasive imaging method of functional near-infrared spectroscopy (fNIRS) has become the reference tool for experimental motor paradigms due to its tolerance to motion artefacts. In the present study, we used a continuous-wave fNIRS system to record the prefrontal and motor hemodynamic responses of 16 participants, while they performed a spatial-tapping task varying in motor complexity and externally-paced tempi (i.e., 300 ms, 500 ms, 1200 ms). To discriminate between physiological noise and cerebral meaningful signals, the physiological data (i.e., heart and respiratory rates) were recorded so that frequency bands of such signals could be regressed from the fNIRS data. Particular attention was taken to control the precise position of the optodes in reference to the cranio-cerebral correlates of the NIR channels throughout the experimental session. Results indicated that fast pacing relied on greater activity of the motor areas whereas moving at close-to-spontaneous pace placed a heavier load on posterior prefrontal processes. These results provide new insight concerning the role of frontal cognitive control in modulating the pacing of voluntary motor behaviors.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Guérin et al. (2021) reported an observational. Spatial-tapping task with varying externally-paced tempi was evaluated on Prefrontal and motor hemodynamic responses. Fast pacing during a spatial-tapping task relied on greater activity of motor areas, whereas moving at close-to-spontaneous pace placed a heavier load on posterior prefrontal processes.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: