Key result
Intraarterial catheterization is linked to acute multiple cholesterol emboli syndrome immediately post-procedure.
Why the study?
What are the clinical presentations and antecedent risk factors of multiple cholesterol emboli syndrome following intraarterial procedures?
Case Report (n=6)
What are the clinical presentations and antecedent risk factors of multiple cholesterol emboli syndrome following intraarterial procedures?
Angiographers should consider multiple cholesterol embolization when multiple organ system dysfunction occurs acutely during or immediately after intraarterial catheterization.
May prompt consideration of cholesterol emboli in acute post-catheterization multiorgan dysfunction; leaves open confirmation of incidence and risk factors.
Six cases of suspected multiple cholesterol emboli syndrome were identified by a review of reports contained in the company's records of adverse event reports. Antecedent risk factors in these reports included cardiac catheterization, thrombolytic therapy, translumbar aortography, renal arteriography, subclavian arteriography, abdominal aortography, and heparinization. Unlike the commonly reported subacute presentation, onset occurred during or immediately after catheterization in 5 of the 6 patients reported. Acute renal failure; hypertension; back, leg, and/or abdominal pain; and livedo reticularis were the events most frequently reported. Angiographers should consider multiple cholesterol embolization when multiple organ system dysfunction occurs during or immediately after intraarterial catheterization.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Hauben et al. (1995) conducted a case report in Multiple cholesterol emboli syndrome (n=6). Intraarterial catheterization and related procedures was evaluated on Clinical presentation and timing of symptom onset. Intraarterial catheterization was associated with acute onset of multiple cholesterol emboli syndrome during or immediately after the procedure in 5 of 6 reported cases.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: