Atomic force microscopy (AFM), transmission electron microscopy (TEM), and static magnetic birefringence (SMB) were used to unfold the particle size polydispersity profile of a magnetite-based magnetic fluid sample. The data obtained from different techniques were curve fitted using the lognormal distribution function, from which the mean particle diameter (Dm) and the standard deviation (σ) were obtained. In comparison to the TEM data, the AFM data show a reduction of Dm (about 20%) and an increase of σ (about 15%). In contrast, close agreement between the TEM and SMB data was found.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Lacava et al. (2000) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: