Key result
Higher α-linolenic acid levels are not linked to incident heart failure risk.
Why the study?
Although alpha-linolenic acid may reduce cardiovascular disease risk, its effect on the risk of heart failure remains unclear.
Does higher α-linolenic acid (ALA) intake or circulating level reduce the risk of incident heart failure?
Meta-Analysis (n=135,270)
Does higher α-linolenic acid (ALA) intake or circulating level reduce the risk of incident heart failure?
Hazard Ratio: 0.95 (95% CI 0.86–1.06)
Higher dietary intake or circulating levels of α-linolenic acid are not associated with a reduced risk of incident heart failure.
No association with incident HF does not support ALA interventions; leaves open causal effects for randomized trials.
Background: The α-linolenic acid is a plant origin n-3 fatty acid that may reduce the risk of cardiovascular disease. However, the effect of α-linolenic acid (ALA) on the risk of heart failure (HF) remains unclear. In this meta-analysis, we aimed to determine the role of ALA in the risk of incident HF. Methods: Electronic databases were searched for studies up to August 10, 2021. Studies were included for meta-analysis if the adjusted risk of HF in different dietary intake or circulating levels of ALA was reported. We used the random-effects model to calculate the estimated hazard ratios (HRs) and 95% CI for higher ALA. Results: A total of 6 studies (7 cohorts) comprising 135,270 participants were included for meta-analysis. After a median follow-up duration of 10 years, 5,905 cases of HF were recorded. No significant heterogeneity was observed among all the included studies. Random-effects model analyses showed that there was no significant association between ALA and the risk of incident HF, either assessed as quintiles (highest quintile vs. lowest quintile: HR = 0.95, 95% CI = 0.86–1.06) or per 1 SD increment (HR = 0.99, 95% CI = 0.95–1.01). Furthermore, we did not observe any association between ALA and the risk of HF in subgroup analyses performed according to age, sex, follow-up duration, and measuring method of ALA. Conclusions: We found no association between ALA and the risk of incident HF, suggesting that ALA might not be effective in the prevention of HF.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
A 2022 study conducted a meta-analysis in Heart Failure (n=135,270). α-Linolenic Acid (ALA) vs. Lowest quintile of ALA was evaluated on Incident heart failure (HR 0.95, 95% CI 0.86-1.06). Higher levels of α-linolenic acid were not significantly associated with the risk of incident heart failure (highest vs. lowest quintile: HR 0.95; 95% CI 0.86-1.06).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: