Key result
Propranolol coadministration does not alter the pharmacokinetics or acute ECG effects of IV quinidine.
Why the study?
Does propranolol alter the pharmacokinetics or acute electrocardiographic effects of intravenous quinidine in healthy volunteers?
Does propranolol alter the pharmacokinetics or acute electrocardiographic effects of intravenous quinidine in healthy volunteers?
Absolute Event Rate: 7.6% vs 7.8%
p-value: p=NS
Propranolol coadministration does not significantly alter the pharmacokinetics or acute electrocardiographic effects of intravenous quinidine.
No interaction in healthy volunteers; leaves open relevance to patients on chronic therapy.
5 healthy volunteers received 4–5 mg/kg of quinidine base by 15-min intravenous infusion on two occasions separated by at least 1 week. Multiple venous blood samples and all urine was collected during the 48 h after each dose and were analyzed for concentrations of total and unbound quinidine (following separation by equilibrium dialysis) by a double-extraction spectrophotofluorometric technique. The first quinidine administration was a ‘control’; for the second quinidine administration, propranolol (40 mg orally every 4–6 h) was given, starting 12 h before the quinidine dosage and continuing for the the duration of the trial. A high degree of β-blockade, assessed by intravenous isoproterenol sensitivity, was achieved by propranolol treatment. Mean (± SE) kinetic variables for quinidine during control and propranolol trials, respectively, were: volume of distribution, 3.0 ± 0.5 versus 2.9 ± 0.5 1/kg (NS); elimination half-life, 7.8 ± 1.1 versus 7.6 ± 0.7 h (NS); total clearance, 4.5 ± 0.6 versus 4.3 ± 0.6 ml/min/kg (NS); renal clearance, 1.58 ± 0.2 versus 1.57 ± 0.2 ml/min/kg (NS); percent unbound, 23.0 ± 1.1 versus 23.6 ± 1.3% (NS). Intravenous quinidine produced tachycardia, T-wave flattening, and prolongation of the QT-interval; none of the changes were influenced by propranolol coadministration. Thus propranolol did not significantly alter the pharmacokinetics or acute electrocardiographic effects of intravenous quinidine in healthy volunteers.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Ochs et al. (2008) studied Healthy volunteers (n=5). Propranolol vs. Control (quinidine alone) was evaluated on Elimination half-life of quinidine (hours) (p=NS). Propranolol coadministration did not significantly alter the pharmacokinetics (e.g., elimination half-life 7.6 vs 7.8 h) or acute electrocardiographic effects of intravenous quinidine.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: