Key result
Indicated ACEI/ARB therapy is used ~10% less often in highest-risk AMI patients versus lowest-risk patients.
Why the study?
What are the patterns and trends of ACEI/ARB use among AMI patients with Class I indications in China from 2001 to 2011?
Observational
Yes
What are the patterns and trends of ACEI/ARB use among AMI patients with Class I indications in China from 2001 to 2011?
Absolute Event Rate: 63.5% vs 70.7%
p-value: p=<0.001
Despite guideline recommendations, one third of Chinese AMI patients with Class I indications do not receive ACEI/ARB therapy during hospitalization, highlighting a significant gap in quality of care.
Suboptimal ACEI/ARB use persists in Chinese AMI with little improvement; leaves open the need to identify barriers and target high-risk patients.
BACKGROUND: Chinese and U.S. guidelines recommend angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors (ACEIs)/angiotensin receptor blockers (ARBs) for all patients with acute myocardial infarction (AMI) in the absence of contraindications as either a Class I or Class IIa recommendation. Little is known about the use and trends of ACEI/ARB therapy in China over the past decade. METHODS AND RESULTS: Using nationally representative data from the China Patient-centered Evaluative Assessment of Cardiac Events Retrospective Study of Acute Myocardial Infarction (China PEACE-Retrospective AMI Study), we assessed use of ACEI/ARB therapy in 2001, 2006, and 2011, overall and across geographic regions and strata of estimated mortality risk, and predictors of ACEI/ARB therapy, among patients with Class I indication by Chinese guidelines. The weighted rate of ACEI/ARB therapy increased from 62.0% in 2001 to 71.4% in 2006, decreasing to 67.6% in 2011. Use was low across all 5 geographic regions. By strata of estimated mortality risk, in 2001, rates of therapy increased with increasing risk; however, by 2011, this reversed and those at higher risk were less likely to be treated (70.7% in lowest-risk quintile vs. 63.5% in the highest-risk quintile; P<0.001). CONCLUSION: One third of Chinese AMI patients with Class I indications do not receive ACEI/ARB therapy during hospitalization, with little improvement in rates over time. Patients at higher mortality risk in 2011 were less likely to be treated, highlighting important opportunities to optimize the use of this cost-effective therapy. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION URL: ClinicalTrials.gov. Unique identifier: NCT01624883.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Liu et al. (2015) conducted an observational in Acute Myocardial Infarction. Highest-risk quintile for mortality vs. Lowest-risk quintile for mortality was evaluated on Receipt of ACEI/ARB therapy (p=<0.001). In 2011, Chinese AMI patients in the highest-risk quintile for mortality were less likely to receive indicated ACEI/ARB therapy compared to those in the lowest-risk quintile (63.5% vs 70.7%; P<0.001).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: