Key result
IV mexiletine matches procainamide for treating VPCs with less impact on blood pressure.
Why the study?
Does a single intravenous injection of mexiletine improve ventricular premature contractions compared to procainamide in patients with VPC?
RCT (n=56)
Single-blind
Envelope method
Yes
Does a single intravenous injection of mexiletine improve ventricular premature contractions compared to procainamide in patients with VPC?
Intravenous mexiletine is as effective as procainamide for treating ventricular premature contractions but has significantly less impact on blood pressure.
May favor IV mexiletine for VPCs due to less BP effect; Level 5 data leaves randomized confirmation open.
In a well-controlled study the clinical efficacy of a single intravenous injection of mexiletine (3 mg/Kg) on ventricular premature contractions was compared with that of procainamide (10 mg/Kg) using continuous electrocardiographic recordings. Of the 56 subjects studied, 55 were analyzed. These consisted of 28 cases in the mexiletine group and 27 in the procainamide group. The backgrounds of both groups were considered to be equivalent. Effectiveness on VPC ("marked and moderate improvement", as judged by the subcommittee) was seen in 88% of the mexiletine group and 84.6% of the procainamide group. This difference was not significant. The duration of efficacy was almost the same in the 2 groups. Overall improvement was the same as improvement in VPC. No significant difference was observed in the incidence of side effects. Five patients in the mexiletine group and 3 in the procainamide group reported side effects. The main side effect was light-headedness in the mexiletine group and a decrease in blood pressure in the procainamide group. A decrease in blood pressure was observed in 1 case in the mexiletine group but this was restored by an intravenous infusion of noradrenaline. Mexiletine had little effect on blood pressure, while procainamide induced a drop in the systolic pressure. This difference was significant. Overall utility ("markedly and moderately useful", as judged by the subcommittee) was seen in 84.0% of the mexiletine group and 84.6% of the procainamide group. There was no significant difference between the 2 groups. From the above results, it is concluded that mexiletine (3 mg/Kg) is as efficacious as procainamide (10 mg/Kg) in the treatment of VPC but that, unlike procainamide, mexiletine has little effect on blood pressure.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Arakawa et al. (1984) conducted an RCT in Ventricular premature contractions (n=56). Mexiletine vs. Procainamide 10 mg/kg IV was evaluated on Improvement in ventricular premature contractions (marked and moderate improvement) (p=not significant). Intravenous mexiletine (3 mg/kg) was as efficacious as procainamide (10 mg/kg) in treating ventricular premature contractions, achieving an 88.0% improvement rate versus 84.6% for procainamide, with less effect on blood pressure.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: