Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
The synthesis and characterization of regioirregular macrocyclics based on the conformationally flexible 1-(4-hydroxyphenyl)-2-(2-methyl-4-hydroxyphenyl)ethane (MBPE) and α,ω-dibromoalkanes, i.e ., MBPE-(c) X ( z ) (where c stands for cyclic, X = 4, 5, 9, and 11 represents the number of methylenic groups in the flexible spacer and z = 1−5 is the degree of oligomerization of the macrocyclic) and the comparison of their phase behavior with that of the corresponding high molecular weight linear polymers MBPE-(l)X (where l stands for linear and X has the same meaning as in the case of cyclics) are described. The effects of X and z on the phase behavior of MBPE-(c) X ( z ) is discussed. For proper ( X, z ) pairs such as (4, 5), (5, 4), (9, 3), (9, 4), (11, 3), and (11, 4), MBPE-(c)X(z) have a higher ability to generate and stabilize liquid-crystalline (LC) phases than the corresponding linear polymers. MBPE-(l) X with X = odd numbers exhibit two uniaxial nematic phases. MBPE-(c) X ( z ) do not display the second uniaxial nematic phase that is exhibited by the linear polymers. This second nematic phase is converted to a smectic A phase through cyclization. An explanation for this behavior is suggested.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Percec et al. (1996) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: