Key result
Sex-specific troponin thresholds classify more females and fewer males as low-risk versus uniform cutoffs.
Its licence doesn't allow us to show a copy here.
Why the study?
Whether the use of a uniform cardiac troponin rule-out threshold results in sex differences in care remains unclear.
Observational (n=16,792)
Cohort study reveals uniform cardiac troponin thresholds safely rule out myocardial infarction in both sexes, indicating sex-specific cutoffs offer limited clinical benefit.
BACKGROUND Myocardial infarction can be ruled out in patients with a single cardiac troponin measurement. Whether use of a uniform rule-out threshold has resulted in sex-differences in care remains unclear. OBJECTIVES To evaluate implementation of a uniform rule-out threshold in females and males with possible myocardial infarction, and to derive and validate sex-specific thresholds. METHODS The implementation of a uniform rule-out threshold (<5 ng/L) with a high-sensitivity cardiac troponin I assay was evaluated in consecutive patients presenting with possible myocardial infarction. The proportion of low-risk patients discharged from Emergency Department (ED) and incidence of myocardial infarction or cardiac death at 30 days were determined. Sex-specific thresholds were derived and validated, and proportion of female and male patients stratified as low-risk compared with uniform threshold RESULTS: In 16,792 patients (58±17 years, 46% female) care was guided using a uniform threshold. This identified more female than male patients as low-risk (73% versus 62%), but a similar proportion of low-risk patients were discharged from ED (81% for both) with fewer than 5 (<0.1%) patients having a subsequent myocardial infarction or cardiac death at 30 days. Compared to uniform threshold of <5 ng/L, use of sex-specific thresholds would increase the proportion of female (61.8% versus 65.9%) and reduce the proportion of male (54.8% versus 47.8%) patients identified as low-risk. CONCLUSIONS Implementation of a uniform rule-out threshold for myocardial infarction was safe and effective in both sexes. Sex-specific rule-out thresholds should be considered, but their impact on effectiveness and safety may be limited.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Li et al. (2024) conducted an observational in possible myocardial infarction (n=16,792). Uniform rule-out threshold (<5 ng/L) with high-sensitivity cardiac troponin I vs. Sex-specific thresholds was evaluated on Proportion of patients identified as low-risk and incidence of myocardial infarction or cardiac death at 30 days. Compared to a uniform troponin threshold (<5 ng/L), sex-specific thresholds would increase the proportion of females (61.8% vs 65.9%) and reduce males (54.8% vs 47.8%) identified as low-risk.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: