Why the study?
Expert recommendations suggest accounting for sex with hs-cTn, but there is no clear evidence regarding the clinical implementation of sex-specific cutoff values, sparking controversy.
Do sex-specific high-sensitivity cardiac troponin cutoff values improve the diagnosis of myocardial infarction in patients with acute chest pain compared to overall cutoff values?
Do sex-specific high-sensitivity cardiac troponin cutoff values improve the diagnosis of myocardial infarction in patients with acute chest pain compared to overall cutoff values?
The review highlights the ongoing controversy and discusses strategies regarding the use of sex-specific versus overall high-sensitivity cardiac troponin cutoff values for diagnosing myocardial infarction in patients with acute chest pain.
Sex-specific hs-cTn cutoffs remain controversial for MI diagnosis; leaves open optimal thresholds and rapid rule-out strategies pending prospective data.
Cardiac troponins are pivotal in the evaluation of patients who suffer from acute chest pain, and the introduction of the high-sensitivity cardiac troponins (hs-cTn) has shown that there are differences between male and female patients. Recent recommendations from experts point out that an appropriate evaluation must take into account the patients’ sex, but there is no clear evidence of the implementation of this recommendation in the clinical practice, and the matter has sparked controversy. If the same cutoff value is used for both sexes, myocardial infarction in men might be overdiagnosed, especially in the elderly, who have relatively higher values, and might be underdiagnosed in most women. The International Federation of Clinical Chemistry and Laboratory Medicine Task Force on Clinical Applications of Cardiac Bio-Markers (IFCCLM, TF-CB) 2018 and the Fourth Universal Definition of Acute Myocardial Infarction support the overall and sex-specific 99th percentile Upper Reference Limit (URL) cutoff value, but based on the definition of hs-cTn assays, the Limit of Detection (LoD) may be considered a starting point for an assessment method that does not differentiate between the levels of hs-cTn in male and female patients suspected of suffering from acute coronary syndrome (ACS). In this paper, we discuss the evidence and a novel strategy based on hs-cTn for rapidly ruling out myocardial infarction in low-risk patients who suffer from acute chest pain.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Ramos et al. (2019) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: