Key result
Percutaneous transhepatic access achieves 97% procedural success in patients with limited venous access.
Why the study?
Is percutaneous transhepatic venous access safe and effective for interventional cardiac catheterization in patients with limited venous access?
Observational (n=25)
Is percutaneous transhepatic venous access safe and effective for interventional cardiac catheterization in patients with limited venous access?
Percutaneous transhepatic access is a highly successful and generally safe alternative route for patients requiring interventional cardiac catheterization who have limited traditional venous access.
May offer alternative access in select patients with limited venous access; leaves open need for prospective safety data.
We evaluate the efficacy and safety of percutaneous transhepatic (TH) venous access for interventional cardiac catheterization. A retrospective review of all TH therapeutic catheterizations between January 1994 and September 1998 was performed. Patient demographics, pre- and postcatheterization hemoglobin and liver function studies, and complications were evaluated. TH access was performed for 30 interventional catheterizations in 25 patients with a median age of 39 months (range, 1 day to 41 years) and weight of 13.2 kg (3.1-87.0 kg). Indications for TH access were bilateral obstructed femoral veins (n = 15), obstructed femoral veins and superior vena cava (n = 3), Greenfield filter (n = 2), and presumptive improved route for intervention via TH access (n = 5). TH interventions were successful in 29/30 procedures (97%). Interventions via TH sheath sizes of 4-14 Fr included pulmonary angioplasty +/- stent (n = 11), radiofrequency ablation (n = 4), atrial septal defect device occlusion (n = 2), coil occlusion of pulmonary artery pseduoaneurysm (n = 2), Fontan fenestration device occlusion (n = 2), pulmonary valvuloplasty (n = 2), stent dilation of the superior vena cava (n = 2), and one each of device retrieval, Fontan baffle stent placement and subsequent redilation, Fontan fenestration dilation, transseptal mitral valvuloplasty, and cardiac biopsy. There were no changes in pre- and post-TH hemoglobin levels (mean +/- SD, 12.9+/-2.2 vs. 11.9+/-1.9 gm/dL; P = NS) or alanine transferase (34.0+/-27.5 vs. 43.4+/-18.2 IU/L; P = NS). One patient developed important intraperitoneal bleeding and required exploratory laporatomy. Percutaneous TH access is safe and effective as a route for interventional catheter procedures for patients with limited venous access.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Shim et al. (1999) conducted an observational in Limited venous access requiring interventional cardiac catheterization (n=25). Percutaneous transhepatic venous access was evaluated on Procedural success. Percutaneous transhepatic venous access was successful in 97% (29/30) of interventional catheter procedures for patients with limited venous access, with one major bleeding complication.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: