Key result
Combined narrow pulse pressure and wide QRS linked to ~50% shorter survival in HF outpatients.
Why the study?
Does the combination of pulse pressure and QRS width predict mortality in heart failure outpatients?
Cohort (n=327)
Does the combination of pulse pressure and QRS width predict mortality in heart failure outpatients?
p-value: p=.022
Combining pulse pressure and QRS width provides an inexpensive and readily available clinical tool to identify heart failure outpatients at increased risk of mortality.
May aid HF mortality risk stratification via routine measures; hypothesis-generating and requires prospective validation.
Decreased pulse pressure (PP) is associated with low cardiac output and increased mortality in heart failure (HF) inpatients. QRS width is a well-known prognostic factor in HF. The study purpose was to explore the mortality effect of combining PP and QRS width in HF outpatients. Initial sphygmomanometrically determined PP and QRS width on the first electrocardiograph in 327 consecutive patients at an HF clinic were recorded. According to PP > or = or <40 mm Hg and QRS width > or = or <120 ms, patients were classified into 4 groups. Study groups were analyzed for their effect on mortality using Cox proportional hazards regression analysis. Patients with PP <40 mm Hg had higher mortality (59% vs 45%; P=.015). QRS width > or =120 ms indicated a trend toward higher mortality (57% vs 48%; P=.067). Actuarial survival curves showed that group 4 (QRS width > or =120 ms and PP <40 mm Hg) had significant increased mortality risk in 3.5 years' mean follow-up. Group 4 had a mean survival time of 1124 days (SD=124) vs 2233 days (SD=285) in group 1 (QRS width <120 ms and PP > or =40 mm Hg) (P=.022). There was a linear association between left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) and study groups. PP and QRS width are readily available, inexpensive, and relevant clinical measures to help identify HF outpatients with significantly worse prognosis and decreased LVEF.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Goldraich et al. (2009) conducted a cohort in Heart failure (n=327). Combined pulse pressure <40 mm Hg and QRS width ≥120 ms vs. Pulse pressure ≥40 mm Hg and QRS width <120 ms was evaluated on Mortality (p=.022). Combined pulse pressure <40 mm Hg and QRS width ≥120 ms in heart failure outpatients significantly decreased mean survival time compared to those without either factor (1124 vs 2233 days; P=.022).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: