Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Prospective registry demonstrates high procedural success and low adverse events with optical coherence tomography-guided PCI in complex lesions, suggesting routine clinical utility.
Optical coherence tomography (OCT) is reported to be a feasible and safe imaging modality for the guidance of percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) of complex lesions. This multicenter, prospective registry assessed the minimum stent area (MSA) achieved under OCT guidance. A performance goal of 24% improvement in MSA over and above the recommendation set by the European Association of Percutaneous Cardiovascular Interventions Consensus 2018 (4.5 mm2 MSA for non-left main and 3.5 mm2 for small vessels). The incidence of contrast-induced nephropathy was also assessed. Core lab analysis was conducted. Five hundred patients (average age: 59.4 ± 10.1 years; 83% males) with unstable angina (36.8%), NSTEMI (26.4%), and STEMI (22%) were enrolled. The primary endpoint was achieved in 93% of lesions with stent diameter ≥2.75 mm (average MSA: 6.44 mm2) and 87% of lesions with stent diameter ≤2.5 mm (average MSA: 4.56 mm2). The average MSA (with expansion ≥80% cutoff) was 6.63 mm2 and 4.74 mm2 with a stent diameter ≥2.75 mm and ≤2.5 mm, respectively. According to the core lab analysis, the average MSA achieved with a stent diameter ≥2.75 mm and ≤2.5 mm was 6.23 mm2 and 3.95 mm2, respectively (with expansion ≥80% cutoff). Clinically significant serum creatinine was noted in two patients (0.45%). Major adverse cardiac events at 1 year were noted in 1.2% (n = 6) of the patients; all were cardiac deaths. PCI under OCT guidance improves procedural and long-term clinical outcomes in patients with complex lesions not just in a controlled trial environment but also in routine clinical practice.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Chandra et al. (2023) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: