Key result
Off-pump CABG shows similar long-term major event rates compared to on-pump CABG in older patients.
Why the study?
Does off-pump CABG improve short-term and long-term clinical outcomes compared to on-pump CABG in patients older than 60 years with stable CAD and preserved LVEF?
RCT (n=176)
Open-label
Randomized
No
Does off-pump CABG improve short-term and long-term clinical outcomes compared to on-pump CABG in patients older than 60 years with stable CAD and preserved LVEF?
In patients over 60 years of age with stable CAD and preserved LVEF, off-pump and on-pump CABG yield similar rates of composite cardiovascular events at 5 years.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Supports individualized CABG technique selection by expertise in patients >60 years; confirms long-term equivalence of off-pump and on-pump approaches.
We aim to evaluate in-hospital events and long-term clinical outcomes in patients over 60 years of age with stable coronary artery disease and preserved left ventricular ejection fraction undergoing off-pump or on-pump coronary artery bypass grafting. The MASS III was a single-center randomized trial that evaluate 308 patients with stable coronary artery disease and preserved ventricular function assigned for: 155 to off-pump and 153 to on-pump CABG. Of this, 176 (58.3%) patients were 60 years or older at the time of randomization (90 of-pump and 86 on-pump). The primary short-term end point was a composite of myocardial infarction, stroke, and overall mortality occurring within 30 days after surgery or before discharge, whichever was later. The primary long-term end point was death from any cause within 5 years, non-fatal myocardial infarction between 30 days and 5 years, or additional revascularization between 30 days and 5 years. On-pump CABG had a higher incidence of 30-day composite outcome than off-pump CABG (15,1% and 5.6%, respectively; P = 0.036). However, after the multivariate analysis, this association lost statistical significance, P = 0.05. After 5-year follow-up, there were no significant differences between both strategies of CABG in the composite end points 16.7% and 15.1%; Hazard Ratio 1.07; CI 0.41 – 1.82; P = 0.71, for off-pump and on-pump CABG respectively. On-pump and off-pump CABG achieved similar results of combined events at short-term and 5-year follow-up. Clinical Trial Registration Information—URL: http://www.controlled-trials.com . Registration number: ISRCTN59539154 .
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Melo et al. (2014) conducted an RCT in Stable coronary artery disease (n=176). Off-pump coronary artery bypass grafting vs. On-pump coronary artery bypass grafting was evaluated on Composite of death from any cause within 5 years, non-fatal myocardial infarction between 30 days and 5 years, or additional revascularization between 30 days and 5 years (HR 1.07, 95% CI 0.41-1.82, p=0.71). Off-pump CABG resulted in similar rates of the 5-year composite endpoint of death, myocardial infarction, or repeat revascularization compared to on-pump CABG in patients older than 60 years (16.7% vs 15.1%; HR 1.07, P=0.71).
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: