Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
The calculations of density functional theory at the B3LYP/3‐21G* level have been employed to optimize the 1,3,5‐triamino‐2,4,6‐trinitrobenzene (TATB)CH2F2 complex. The complex binding energy is corrected for the basis set superposition error. In addition, the interactions of TATB with (CUVCXY) n (U, V, X, Y = H. U = F; V, X, Y = H. U, V = F; X, Y = H. U, V, X = F; Y = H. U, V, X, Y = F. U, V, X = F; Y = Cl) have been studied with the MO‐PM3 method, and the complex binding energy with approximation of electron correlation correction by the dispersion energy has been given. The results computed indicate that the greatest corrected binding energy of TATB and CH2F2 is −4.62 kJ mol−1 at the B3LYP/6‐311G*//B3LYP/3‐21G* level. The interactions of (CF2CH2) n with TATB and of (CF2CFH) n with TATB are stronger than those of (CUVCXY) n (U, V, X, Y = H. U = F; V, X, Y = H. U, V, X, Y = F. U, V, X = F; Y = Cl) with TATB (n = 5).
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Xiao et al. (2001) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: