Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
The molecular structure of the title compound has been determined by gas-phase electron diffraction, the vapour composition being obtained by quadrupole mass spectrometry. The experimental data can best be approximated by a model with a puckered four-membered ring (C2v symmetry). This deviation from D2h symmetry may be a consequence of large-amplitude vibrations around an imaginary axis connecting the two bridging chlorine atoms. The bond lengths and angles for the puckered-ring model are ra(Fe–Cl)(terminal) 2.127(4), ra(Fe–Cl)(bridge) 2.326(5)Å, Clt–Fe–Clt 124.3(7), and Clb–Fe–Clb 90.7(4)°. The bond lengths and force constants indicate that the terminal Fe–Cl bonds are considerably stronger than the bridging ones.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Hargittai et al. (1980) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: