Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
The objective of this study was to evaluate the imipenem (IMP) and IMP+EDTA (IMP/IMP+EDTA) disk method for the detection of metallo-beta-lactamases (MBLs) in clinical isolates of Klebsiella pneumoniae with various MIC levels to IMP. Forty-one blood isolates of K. pneumoniae with MIC to IMP ranging from < or =0.5 to > or =16 microg/ml were examined. The MICs were determined by VITEK-2 (bioMerieux Vitek two, France). Disks of 10 microg IMP with and without the addition of 0.5 M EDTA were used for the IMP/IMP+EDTA disk method. The E-test (AB Biodisk, Solna, Sweden) for MBL detection was also used. All isolates were examined for the bla (VIM-1) gene by PCR and for clonality of VIM-1-producing isolates by pulsed-field gel electrophoresis (PFGE). All isolates with MIC values of IMP < or =0.5 microg/ml exhibited no differences in inhibition zone diameters (IZD) produced by IMP and IMP+EDTA disks, whereas the isolates with MICs > or =1 microg/ml showed an increase in IZD, ranging from 8 to 26 mm. All isolates with MIC values of > or =1 microg/ml were found positive for the bla (VIM-1) gene by PCR and for MBL production by the E-test, whereas none of isolates with MICs <0.5 microg/ml was found positive by any of the tests. DNA restriction fragments generated by PFGE of VIM-1-producing isolates were classified in four main types. The IMP/IMP+EDTA disk method is simple to perform, sensitive, and specific for detection of MBL-producing K. pneumoniae clinical isolates. K. pneumoniae isolates with MICs of IMP > or =1 microg/ml and/or IZD produced by IMP disk <19 mm should be tested for MBL production.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Petropoulou et al. (2006) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: