Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
The evaluation of short answers from numerous students requires a highly reliable and efficient scoring system that incorporates natural language processing. Specifically, for higher reliability, higher indicators such as accuracy are desirable, whereas for higher efficiency, less data are desirable for labelling. Moreover, these desires are more acute with larger data sets. In this study, we proposed a novel workflow using active and deep learning to improve the accuracy of automated scoring while reducing the scoring cost incurred through manual scoring. In a trial common test for university entrance examinations, the proposed workflow automatically scored more than 60,000 short answers per question (in Japanese). Consequently, we obtained high accuracy for all the questions in the test. In particular, the proposed workflow achieved an accuracy as high as 0.999, which is consistent with the existing manual grading approach in terms of accuracy. Furthermore, the cost of human scoring was reduced to less than one-sixth that of the training data on average, which is a significant advantage over other machine learning methods. Thus, the proposed workflow demonstrates the potential for advancing practical applications of automated scoring.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Osaka et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: