Key result
In l-NAME-treated hypertensive rats, valsartan attenuated cardiac hypertrophy and improved vasoconstriction, whereas fasudil normalized endothelium-dependent vasodilation.
Why the study?
Does fasudil or valsartan improve vascular dysfunction in l-NAME-induced hypertensive rats?
Does fasudil or valsartan improve vascular dysfunction in l-NAME-induced hypertensive rats?
In a rat model of NO-deficient hypertension, angiotensin II receptor blockade improves contractile responses and cardiac hypertrophy, whereas Rho-kinase inhibition better restores endothelium-dependent vasorelaxation.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Fasudil improves vascular function comparably to valsartan in L-NAME rats; leaves open clinical translation of Rho-kinase inhibition.
Little attention has been paid to the effect of Rho-kinase inhibitor on the vascular dysfunction of nitric oxide-deficient hypertension. We aimed to investigate whether the Rho-kinase inhibitor fasudil showed beneficial effect on the vascular dysfunction of the NG-nitro-l-arginine methyl ester (l-NAME) treated rat, as well as to compare the differential effects of fasudil and angiotensin II receptor antagonist valsartan on vascular function. In the present study, both valsartan and fasudil exerted antihypertensive action on the l-NAME-treated rats, while only valsartan attenuated the cardiac hypertrophy. Treatment with valsartan showed improvement on vascular reactivity to norepinephrine, KCl and CaCl2, whereas fasudil therapy showed little effect on vasoconstriction. Endothelium-dependent vasodilation to acetylcholine was reduced in the NO-deficient group but was normalized by the fasudil therapy. The increased expression of RhoA and Rho-kinase (ROCK) in the vasculature was corrected well to normal level by either valsartan or fasudil administration, which seemed to be at least partially responsible for the beneficial effect of the drug infusion. These findings suggest that the angiotensin II receptor antagonist interferes more with the contractile response than Rho-kinase inhibitor, whereas inhibition of Rho-kinase activity exhibits a better improvement on vasorelaxation than blockade of angiotensin II receptor.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Chen et al. (2012) studied Nitric oxide-deficient hypertension. Fasudil and Valsartan vs. NO-deficient control group was evaluated on Vascular function (vasoconstriction and vasodilation) and cardiac hypertrophy. In l-NAME-treated hypertensive rats, valsartan attenuated cardiac hypertrophy and improved vasoconstriction, whereas fasudil normalized endothelium-dependent vasodilation.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: