Key result
Bevacizumab within one day of port placement linked to ~710% higher risk of dehiscence-related removal.
Why the study?
Does the timing of bevacizumab administration affect the risk of wound dehiscence requiring port explant in patients undergoing chest wall port placement?
Cohort (n=1,108)
Does the timing of bevacizumab administration affect the risk of wound dehiscence requiring port explant in patients undergoing chest wall port placement?
Administering bevacizumab within 14 days of chest wall port placement significantly increases the risk of wound dehiscence requiring port explant.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Bevacizumab within 7 days of port placement was associated with higher wound dehiscence risk; leaves open optimal safe interval pending prospective data.
BACKGROUND: The authors investigated how the timing of administration of bevacizumab, a targeted vascular endothelial growth factor-inhibiting chemotherapeutic agent, affected the risk of wound healing in patients undergoing chest wall port placement. METHODS: The authors performed a retrospective search was performed of an institutional review board approved, Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act compliant database between 2002 and 2008, identifying 1108 port placements in patients who were treated with bevacizumab. One hundred twenty of these ports eventually required explant. Data analyzed included patient demographics, indication for port removal, and schedule of bevacizumab therapy. RESULTS: Wound healing complications requiring port explant were seen in 0.9% of placements (10/1108). When bevacizumab was given within 1 day of port placement, the absolute risk (AR) of port removal for wound dehiscence was 2.4% (2/82), compared with 0.3% (3/1021) when 2 or more days had passed between port placement and bevacizumab administration, yielding a statistically significant relative risk (RR) of 8.1 (P < .02). Similarly, when bevacizumab was administered within 7 days of port insertion, there was a significant RR of dehiscence-related port explant (AR 1.4% vs 0.1%, RR 11.5, P < .028). However, no significant RR for dehiscence-related port removal was observed when bevacizumab was administered within 14 days (AR 0.9% vs 0.2%, RR 6.2, P < .09) or 30 days (AR 0.7% vs 0.2%, RR 3.7, P < .23) of port placement. CONCLUSIONS: The risk of a wound dehiscence requiring chest wall port explant in patients treated with bevacizumab was inversely proportional to the interval between bevacizumab administration and port placement, with significantly higher risk seen when the interval is less than 14 days.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Erinjeri et al. (2010) conducted a cohort in Patients undergoing chest wall port placement (n=1,108). Bevacizumab administration within 1 day of port placement vs. Bevacizumab administration 2 or more days after port placement was evaluated on Port removal for wound dehiscence (RR 8.1, p=<0.02). Administering bevacizumab within 1 day of chest wall port placement increased the risk of port removal for wound dehiscence compared to waiting ≥2 days.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: