Key result
A myosin III tail homology domain I peptide inhibited internal binding of the ankyrin repeat domain and released the espin 1 actin-binding site from autoinhibition.
This study identifies a mechanism by which myosin III can locally activate an additional actin-binding site in espin 1, contributing to the regulation of stereocilia growth.
Advances understanding of stereocilia actin regulation; leaves open relevance to human hearing disorders.
The espin actin-bundling proteins, which are produced as isoforms of different sizes from a single gene, are required for the growth of hair cell stereocilia. We have characterized an additional actin-filament-binding site present in the extended amino-termini of large espin isoforms. Constitutively active in espin 2, the site increased the size of actin bundles formed in vitro and inhibited actin fluorescence recovery in microvilli. In espin 1, which has an N-terminal ankyrin repeat domain, the site was autoinhibited by binding between the ankyrin repeat domain and a peptide near the actin-binding site. Deletion of this peptide from espin 1 activated its actin-binding site. The peptide resembled tail homology domain I of myosin III, a ligand of the ankyrin repeat domain localized with espin 1 at the tip of stereocilia. A myosin III tail homology domain I peptide, but not scrambled control peptides, inhibited internal binding of the ankyrin repeat domain and released the espin 1 actin-binding site from autoinhibition. Thus, this regulation could result in local activation of the additional actin-binding site of espin 1 by myosin III in stereocilia.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Zheng et al. (2014) studied this question. Myosin III tail homology domain I peptide vs. Scrambled control peptides was evaluated on Release of the espin 1 actin-binding site from autoinhibition. A myosin III tail homology domain I peptide inhibited internal binding of the ankyrin repeat domain and released the espin 1 actin-binding site from autoinhibition.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: