Key result
Infectious agents like Chlamydia pneumoniae and cytomegalovirus remain controversially linked to atherosclerosis and ischemic stroke.
Chronic infections and inflammation, marked by elevated CRP, are recognized as potential contributors to the development of atherosclerosis and cardiovascular events.
Observational links warrant no antimicrobial therapy for atherosclerosis prevention; leaves open inflammation's causal role pending trials.
In recent years, the close relation between the development of atherosclerosis and inflammation has been recognized (1).As for the pathogens, Chlamydia pneumoniae (Cpn), cytomegalovirus (CMV), other Herpesvirus andHelicobactor pylori have been the focus of attention.The evidence has been based on the direct observation of pathogens in the atherosclerotic lesions and higher titer of seropositivity or immunecomplex in the patients with cardiovascular events.The mechanisms of development of atherosclerosis induced by infection remain to be clarified.However, the existence of commoninfections, such as chronic respiratory infection, urinary tract infection, and dental infection has been demonstrated to have a greater than 4fold risk of carotid atherosclerosis (2).Since the inflammatory marker, C-reactive protein (CRP), has been reported to be elevated in patients with acute myocardial infarction, CRPis nowthought to be an independent risk factor of cardiovascular events (3, 4).The mechanism of elevation of CRP remains unclear.However, chronic infections are thought to be a potential source of chronically elevated CRP.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Masahiro Yamamoto (2003) conducted an editorial in Atherosclerosis and ischemic stroke. Infectious agents (Chlamydia pneumoniae, cytomegalovirus, Helicobacter pylori) was evaluated. Infectious agents, including Chlamydia pneumoniae and cytomegalovirus, have been controversially linked to the development of atherosclerosis and ischemic stroke in various observational studies.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: