Key result
Elevated troponin at sepsis recognition is not linked to increased hospital mortality versus normal levels.
Why the study?
Cardiac troponins are frequently elevated in patients with sepsis, but the role of troponin elevation at sepsis recognition in risk stratification remains controversial.
Does elevated troponin at sepsis recognition predict increased hospital mortality in adult patients with sepsis without prior cardiovascular disease?
Cohort (n=2,141)
Yes
Does elevated troponin at sepsis recognition predict increased hospital mortality in adult patients with sepsis without prior cardiovascular disease?
Odds Ratio: 1.12 (95% CI 0.86–1.44)
Absolute Event Rate: 35.2% vs 32.7%
p-value: p=0.396
Elevated troponin at the time of sepsis recognition is not significantly associated with increased hospital mortality in patients without prior cardiovascular disease.
Elevated troponin does not predict mortality in sepsis without prior CVD; leaves open its prognostic role pending prospective validation.
Background Sepsis‐induced cardiac dysfunction, known as septic cardiomyopathy, is a common complication associated with increased mortality. Cardiac troponins serve as markers for myocardial injury and are frequently elevated in patients with sepsis. However, the role of troponin elevation at sepsis recognition in risk stratification remains controversial. Methods and Results This nationwide multicenter prospective cohort study analyzed 2141 adult patients with sepsis without prior cardiovascular disease from the Korean Sepsis Alliance registry. These patients were classified as having either elevated troponin levels or troponin levels in the normal range at the time of sepsis recognition, according to the reference ranges specific to each participating institution. The primary outcome was hospital mortality, and propensity score matching was used to control for confounding factors. In the propensity score‐matched cohort (523 pairs), there were no significant differences in hospital mortality (35.2% versus 32.7%, odds ratio [OR], 1.12 [95% CI, 0.86–1.44], P =0.396), hospital length of stay (13.0 versus 15.0 days, OR, 1.00 [95% CI, 0.99–1.00], P =0.128), intensive care unit mortality (24.7% versus 25.0%, OR, 0.98 [95% CI, 0.74–1.30], P =0.886), or intensive care unit length of stay between the elevated troponin and control groups. However, landmark analysis revealed that the elevated troponin group had a lower survival probability after 1 week (log‐rank P =0.033) and significantly higher kidney Sequential Organ Failure Assessment scores from intensive care unit admission to day 7 ( P =0.003). Conclusions Troponin elevation at sepsis recognition was not significantly associated with increased hospital mortality or worse clinical outcomes in patients with sepsis.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Choi et al. (2025) conducted a cohort in Sepsis (n=2,141). Elevated troponin levels at sepsis recognition vs. Troponin levels in the normal range was evaluated on Hospital mortality (OR 1.12, 95% CI 0.86-1.44, p=0.396). Elevated troponin levels at sepsis recognition were not significantly associated with increased hospital mortality compared to normal levels (35.2% vs 32.7%; OR 1.12, 95% CI 0.86-1.44; P=0.396).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: