Why the study?
Although pulmonary vein ectopic beats trigger AF, the electrophysiological determinants of AF initiation from the pulmonary veins remained to be clarified.
Does the location and coupling interval of an ectopic excitation determine the initiation of atrial fibrillation from the pulmonary veins in patients undergoing AF ablation?
Observational (n=62)
Does the location and coupling interval of an ectopic excitation determine the initiation of atrial fibrillation from the pulmonary veins in patients undergoing AF ablation?
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Shorter effective refractory period, greater ERP dispersion, and circumferential conduction delay in the pulmonary veins are key electrophysiological determinants for the initiation of atrial fibrillation by ectopic beats.
Background and Objective: Ectopic beats originating from the pulmonary vein (PV) trigger atrial fibrillation (AF). The purpose of this study was to clarify the electrophysiological determinant of AF initiation from the PVs. Methods: Pacing studies were performed with a single extra stimulus mimicking an ectopic beat in the left superior pulmonary veins (LSPVs) in 62 patients undergoing AF ablation. Inducibility of AF, effective refractory period (ERP) and conduction properties within the PVs were analyzed. Results: A single extra stimulus in LSPV induced AF in 20 patients (32% of all patients) at the mean coupling interval (CI) of 172 ms. A CI-dependent anisotropic conduction at the AF onset was visualized in a 3D-mapping. Onset of AF was site-specific with reproducibility in each individual. Mean ERP in LSPV in the AF inducible group was shorter than that in the AF non-inducible group (182 ± 55 ms vs 254 ± 51 ms, P<0.0001). LSPV ERP dispersion was greater in the AF inducible group than in the AF non-inducible group (45 ± 28 ms vs 27 ± 19 ms, P<0.01). Circumferential intra-PV conduction time (IPVCT) exhibited decremental properties in response to shortening of CI, and the prolongation of IPVCT in the AF inducible site was greater than that in the AF non-inducible site (P<0.05) in each individual. Conclusions: Location and coupling interval of an ectopic excitation ultimately determine the initiation of AF from the PVs. ERP dispersion and circumferential conduction delay may lead to anisotropic conduction and reentry within the PVs that initiate AF.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Kawai et al. (2021) conducted an observational in Atrial fibrillation (n=62). AF inducible group vs. AF non-inducible group was evaluated on Mean effective refractory period (ERP) in the left superior pulmonary vein (p=<0.0001).
Synapse has enriched 8 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: