Key result
Anesthetic technique choice shows no impact on maternal or neonatal outcomes during hypertensive pregnancy C-sections.
Why the study?
Hypertensive disorders in pregnancy are common and major causes of fetomaternal morbidity and mortality, prompting a comparison of clinical outcomes across anesthetic techniques for cesarean section.
Does the choice of anesthetic technique affect maternal and neonatal outcomes in parturients with hypertensive disorders undergoing cesarean section?
Observational (n=95)
No
Does the choice of anesthetic technique affect maternal and neonatal outcomes in parturients with hypertensive disorders undergoing cesarean section?
The choice of anesthesia (subarachnoid block, general anesthesia, or epidural block) did not significantly impact maternal or neonatal outcomes in parturients with hypertensive disorders undergoing cesarean section.
No outcome difference by anesthetic technique; supports regional anesthesia feasibility in this cohort but leaves optimal choice open pending RCTs.
Background: Hypertensive disorders are one of the most common medical complications of pregnancy. It is a major cause of fetomaternal morbidity and mortality. Objectives: This article compares the clinical outcome of anesthetic techniques for parturients with hypertensive disorder undergoing cesarean section. Methods: We conducted a retrospective review of the medical records of patients with hypertensive disorders in pregnancy, who underwent cesarean section from January 2016 to December 2017. Data collected included demographic profiles, specific hypertensive disorders, anesthetic techniques, and maternal and neonatal outcome. Result: Over the reviewed period, 1294 cesarean sections were done, out of which 95 (7.3%) patients had hypertensive disorders in pregnancy. Preeclampsia was the most common hypertensive disorder (45.3%) and it was more common among the multiparus patients. Eight-two patients (86.3%) underwent subarachnoid block with 0.5% heavy bupivacaine, 10 patients (10.5%) had general anesthesia with relaxant technique using isoflurane as the volatile agent, whereas three patients (3.2%) had epidural block with 0.5% plain bupivacaine. Eighty-six patients (90.5%) were done as emergency whereas nine patients (9.5%) were done as elective. A total of 82 (86.3%) neonates had good APGAR score of >7. There was no significant difference between the anesthetic techniques and neonatal outcome, P = 0.642. The proportion of blood loss was more during emergency surgeries. There was no statistical significant difference between the nature of surgery and estimated blood loss, P = 0.691. Out of the 95 parturient, 12 (12.6%) had hypotension that necessitated use of vasopressor (ephedrine), out of which 11 cases were done as emergency whereas one was done as elective. There was no significant difference between the nature of the surgery and the use of vasopressor, P = 0.942. Conclusion: The choice of anesthesia did not have a significant difference on maternal and neonatal outcome following cesarean section in parturient with hypertensive disorders in pregnancy.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Babajide et al. (2019) conducted an observational in Hypertensive disorders in pregnancy (n=95). Anesthetic techniques (subarachnoid block, general anesthesia, epidural block) vs. Compared against each other was evaluated on Neonatal outcome (APGAR score >7) (p=0.642). The choice of anesthetic technique did not significantly affect neonatal outcomes (P=0.642) or maternal outcomes during cesarean sections for hypertensive disorders in pregnancy.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: