Key result
Orthostasis with slow breathing linked to ~180% higher mean PRQ versus supine spontaneous breathing.
Why the study?
To explore the dynamic character of cardiorespiratory coupling under the influence of different body postures and breathing regimes using the pulse respiration quotient.
How does the pulse respiration quotient (PRQ) change under different body postures and breathing regimes in healthy subjects?
Observational (n=20)
How does the pulse respiration quotient (PRQ) change under different body postures and breathing regimes in healthy subjects?
Absolute Event Rate: 13.48% vs 4.81%
p-value: p=<0.001
The pulse respiration quotient is a sensitive measure of cardiorespiratory coupling adaptability to posture and breathing changes, with standing and slow breathing provoking the greatest dynamic modification.
PRQ may index cardiorespiratory coupling adaptability in healthy subjects; leaves open validation and clinical utility in disease.
Objective: In this research we explored the (homeo)dynamic character of cardiorespiratory coupling (CRC) under the influence of different body posture and breathing regimes. Our tool for it was the pulse respiration quotient (PRQ), representing the number of heartbeat intervals per breathing cycle. We obtained non-integer PRQ values using our advanced Matlab ® algorithm and applied it on the signals of 20 healthy subjects in four conditions: supine position with spontaneous breathing (Supin), standing with spontaneous breathing (Stand), supine position with slow (0.1 Hz) breathing (Supin01) and standing with slow (0.1 Hz) breathing (Stand01). Main results: Linear features of CRC (in PRQ signals) were dynamically very sensitive to posture and breathing rhythm perturbations. There are obvious increases in PRQ mean level and variability under the separated and joined influence of orthostasis and slow (0.1 Hz) breathing. This increase was most pronounced in Stand01 as the state of joint influences. Importantly, PRQ dynamic modification showed greater sensitivity to body posture and breathing regime changes than mean value and standard deviation of heart rhythm and breathing rhythm. In addition, as a consequence of prolonged supine position, we noticed the tendency to integer quantization of PRQ (especially after 14 min), in which the most common quantization number was 4:1 (demonstrated in other research reports as well). In orthostasis and slow breathing, quantization can also be observed, but shifted to other values. We postulate that these results manifest resonance effects induced by coupling patterns from sympathetic and parasympathetic adjustments (with the second as dominant factor). Significance: Our research confirms that cardiorespiratory coupling adaptability could be profoundly explored by precisely calculated PRQ parameter since cardiorespiratory regulation in healthy subjects is characterized by a high level of autonomic adaptability (responsiveness) to posture and breathing regime, although comparisons with pathological states has yet to be performed. We found Stand01 to be the most provoking state for the dynamic modification of PRQ (cardiorespiratory inducement). As such, Stand01 has the potential of using for PRQ tuning by conditioning the cardiorespiratory autonomic neural networks, e.g., in the cases where PRQ is disturbed by environmental (i.e., microgravity) or pathologic conditions.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Matić et al. (2022) conducted an observational in Healthy (n=20). Standing posture with slow (0.1 Hz) breathing vs. Supine position with spontaneous breathing was evaluated on Mean Pulse Respiration Quotient (PRQ) (p=<0.001). Orthostasis combined with slow (0.1 Hz) breathing significantly increased the mean level and variability of the pulse respiration quotient compared to supine spontaneous breathing.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: