Key result
Ambulatory pulse pressure provides no risk stratification below age 60 and remains weak in the elderly.
Why the study?
Does 24-hour ambulatory pulse pressure predict cardiovascular events and mortality in the general population?
Cohort (n=9,938)
Yes
Does 24-hour ambulatory pulse pressure predict cardiovascular events and mortality in the general population?
Hazard Ratio: 1.58
p-value: p=0.011
Ambulatory pulse pressure does not add to risk stratification in people under 60 and is only a weak risk factor in the elderly, with levels below 64 mm Hg likely innocuous.
Ambulatory pulse pressure should not inform risk stratification under age 60; leaves open its incremental prognostic value in the elderly.
Evidence-based thresholds for risk stratification based on pulse pressure (PP) are currently unavailable. To derive outcome-driven thresholds for the 24-hour ambulatory PP, we analyzed 9938 participants randomly recruited from 11 populations (47.3% women). After age stratification (<60 versus ≥60 years) and using average risk as reference, we computed multivariable-adjusted hazard ratios (HRs) to assess risk by tenths of the PP distribution or risk associated with stepwise increasing (+1 mm Hg) PP levels. All adjustments included mean arterial pressure. Among 6028 younger participants (68 853 person-years), the risk of cardiovascular (HR, 1.58; P=0.011) or cardiac (HR, 1.52; P=0.056) events increased only in the top PP tenth (mean, 60.6 mm Hg). Using stepwise increasing PP levels, the lower boundary of the 95% confidence interval of the successive thresholds did not cross unity. Among 3910 older participants (39 923 person-years), risk increased (P≤0.028) in the top PP tenth (mean, 76.1 mm Hg). HRs were 1.30 and 1.62 for total and cardiovascular mortality, and 1.52, 1.69, and 1.40 for all cardiovascular, cardiac, and cerebrovascular events. The lower boundary of the 95% confidence interval of the HRs associated with stepwise increasing PP levels crossed unity at 64 mm Hg. While accounting for all covariables, the top tenth of PP contributed less than 0.3% (generalized R(2) statistic) to the overall risk among the elderly. Thus, in randomly recruited people, ambulatory PP does not add to risk stratification below age 60; in the elderly, PP is a weak risk factor with levels below 64 mm Hg probably being innocuous.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Gu et al. (2013) reported a cohort. 24-hour ambulatory pulse pressure vs. Average risk / lower pulse pressure levels was evaluated on Cardiovascular events (in participants <60 years for top pulse pressure tenth) (HR 1.58, p=0.011). Ambulatory pulse pressure does not add to risk stratification below age 60, and in the elderly, it is a weak risk factor with levels below 64 mm Hg probably being innocuous.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: