Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Background: The adverse events (AEs) of tramadol hydrochloride biphasic immediate–release ⁄ extended–release tablet (tramadol IR/ER tablet) in patients with chronic pain related to commonly examined spine diseases have not been extensively studied. Purpose: To clarify the safety and continuity of tramadol IR/ER tablet for chronic pain associated with spine diseases. Methods: This was a retrospective observational study conducted at 9 institutions. We surveyed the records of patients with chronic pain related to spine diseases who were prescribed twice–daily oral tramadol IR/ER tablets. We evaluated AEs associated with tramadol IR/ER tablets and the continuation rate of tramadol IR/ER tablets at 4 weeks. Results: In total, 139 patients met the study criteria. One hundred thirty patients (93.5%) continued to take tramadol IR/ER tablets for 4 weeks. AEs were observed in 39 patients (28.1%) and included constipation in 18 patients (12.9%), nausea in 10 patients (7.2%), somnolence in 8 patients (5.8%), and dizziness in 4 patients (2.9%). Among 41 patients who switched from other tramadol formulations to tramadol IR/ER tablets, the daily dose of tramadol was increased, yet the incidence of AEs was equivalent (9 patients, 22.0%), with no reported occurrences of nausea. Conclusions: The overall incidence of AEs after administration of tramadol IR/ER tablets was 28.1%, and the continuation rate after 4 weeks was 93.5%. For patients with chronic pain related to spine diseases, switching to tramadol IR/ER tablets may allow for safe continuation of pain treatment.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Akazawa et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: