Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Soil is a complex system where iron (Fe) speciation plays a key role in redox reactions and biogeochemical processes. However, quantitative evaluation of the Fe(II)/Fe(III) ratio in phyllosilicates, which constitute a major Fe reservoir in soils, has remained challenging. In this study, we developed a method to quantify Fe speciation in soils using linear-combination fitting (LCF) of X-ray absorption fine structure (XAFS) spectra with four end members: ferrihydrite, Fe(II)-bearing biotite, Fe(III)-bearing montmorillonite, and adsorbed Fe2+ as hydrated Fe2+ (outer-sphere complex). Principal component analysis confirmed that these four components are sufficient to reproduce Fe K-edge X-ray absorption near-edge structure (XANES) spectra of various soil and sediment samples under both oxic and anoxic conditions. The LCF-XAFS results showed that phyllosilicates account for 40–70% of total Fe in the studied samples, and the ratio of Fe(II) and total Fe in the octahedral layer in phyllosilicates (= Fe(II)phy/Fetotal-phy ratio) varies systematically with redox conditions. Under reducing conditions, ferrihydrite was partially dissolved and replaced by adsorbed Fe2+, while the Fe(II)phy/Fetotal-phy ratio increased significantly. The speciation results were consistent with those obtained by Mössbauer spectroscopy and sequential extraction within ∼10% difference. Furthermore, μ-XANES analysis revealed spatial heterogeneity of Fe speciation at the micrometer scale, demonstrating that the Fe(II)phy/Fetotal-phy ratio in phyllosilicates reflects local redox conditions within soils. These results indicate that the Fe(II)phy/Fetotal-phy in phyllosilicates can serve as a quantitative proxy for redox conditions in soils and sediments.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Takahashi et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: