Key result
Periacetabular osteotomy improves hip strength but leaves a ~34% deficit compared to healthy volunteers.
Why the study?
In patients with hip dysplasia, knowledge of hip muscle strength after periacetabular osteotomy was lacking.
Does periacetabular osteotomy improve isometric hip muscle strength in patients with hip dysplasia?
Cohort (n=132)
No
Does periacetabular osteotomy improve isometric hip muscle strength in patients with hip dysplasia?
Mean Difference: 0.13 (95% CI 0.06–0.2)
Absolute Event Rate: 1.3% vs 1.2%
p-value: p=<0.001
Periacetabular osteotomy improves isometric hip muscle strength in patients with hip dysplasia at 1 year, but strength remains significantly lower than in healthy volunteers.
Gains after periacetabular osteotomy leave strength below healthy norms in dysplasia; leaves open whether rehab closes the gap.
Background and purpose - In patients with hip dysplasia, knowledge of hip muscle strength after periacetabular osteotomy is lacking. We investigated isometric hip muscle strength in patients with hip dysplasia, before and 1 year after periacetabular osteotomy, and compared this with healthy volunteers. Furthermore, we investigated whether pre- to post-surgical changes in self-reported pain and sporting function were associated with changes in isometric hip muscle strength.Patients and methods - Isometric hip muscle strength was assessed twice in 82 patients (11 men) with a mean age of 30 (SD 9) years, before and 1 year after surgery, and once in 50 healthy volunteers. Isometric hip muscle strength was assessed with a hand-held dynamometer. Copenhagen Hip and Groin Outcome Score was used to measure self-reported outcome.Results - Despite 1-year improvements in isometric hip flexion (0.1 Nm/kg; 95% CI 0.06-0.2) and abduction (0.1 Nm/kg; CI 0.02-0.2), the patients' muscle strength was 13-34% lower than the strength of the healthy volunteers both pre- and post-surgery (p < 0.01). Moreover, changes in self-reported pain were associated with changes in hip flexion (13 points per Nm/kg; CI 1-26) and abduction (14 points per Nm/kg; CI 3-25), while changes in self-reported sporting function were associated with changes in hip extension (9 points per Nm/kg; CI 1-18).Interpretation - Isometric hip muscle strength is impaired in symptomatic dysplastic hips measured before periacetabular osteotomy. 1 year after surgery, isometric hip flexion and abduction strength had improved but muscle strength did not reach that of healthy volunteers.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Jacobsen et al. (2021) conducted a cohort in Hip dysplasia (n=132). Periacetabular osteotomy vs. Baseline and healthy volunteers was evaluated on Change in isometric hip flexion strength (Nm/kg) (MD 0.13 Nm/kg, 95% CI 0.06-0.20, p=<0.001). Periacetabular osteotomy improved isometric hip flexion by 0.13 Nm/kg and abduction by 0.10 Nm/kg at 1 year, but patients' muscle strength remained 13-34% lower than healthy volunteers.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: