Key result
Pravastatin fails to improve coronary vascular response to acetylcholine versus placebo.
Why the study?
Does pravastatin improve endothelium dependent vasomotion in non-smoking, non-hypercholesterolaemic patients scheduled for elective balloon angioplasty?
RCT (n=63)
double blind
randomised
Yes
Does pravastatin improve endothelium dependent vasomotion in non-smoking, non-hypercholesterolaemic patients scheduled for elective balloon angioplasty?
p-value: p=0.09
Pravastatin 40 mg daily did not significantly improve endothelium-dependent vasomotion after elective balloon angioplasty in non-smoking, non-hypercholesterolemic patients.
Pravastatin confers no endothelial benefit after angioplasty in non-hypercholesterolemic patients; challenges lipid-independent statin effects on vasomotion.
OBJECTIVE: To test the hypothesis that the 3-hydroxy-3-methylglutaryl coenzyme-A reductase inhibitor pravastatin ameliorates endothelium mediated responses of dilated coronary segments: the PREFACE (pravastatin related effects following angioplasty on coronary endothelium) trial. DESIGN: A double blind, randomised, placebo controlled, multicentre study. SETTING: Four hospitals in the Netherlands. PATIENTS: 63 non-smoking, non-hypercholesterolaemic patients scheduled for elective balloon angioplasty (pravastatin 34, placebo 29). INTERVENTIONS: The effects of three months of pravastatin treatment (40 mg daily) on endothelium dependent vasomotor function were studied. Balloon angioplasty was undertaken one month after randomisation, and coronary vasomotor function tests using acetylcholine were performed two months after balloon angioplasty. The angiograms were analysed quantitatively. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: The efficacy measure was the acetylcholine induced change in mean arterial diameter, determined in the dilated segment and in an angiographically normal segment of an adjacent non-manipulated coronary artery. RESULTS: Increasing acetylcholine doses produced vasoconstriction in the dilated segments (p = 0.004) but not in the normal segments. Pravastatin did not affect the vascular response to acetylcholine in either the dilated segments (p = 0.09) or the non-dilated sites. Endothelium dependent vasomotion in normal segments was correlated with that in dilated segments (r = 0.47, p < 0.001). There were fewer procedure related events in the pravastatin group than in the placebo group (p < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: Endothelium dependent vasomotion in normal segments is correlated with that in dilated segments. A significant beneficial effect of pravastatin on endothelial function could not be shown, but in the dilated segments there was a trend towards a beneficial treatment effect in the pravastatin group.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Johannes Mulder (2001) conducted an RCT in scheduled for elective balloon angioplasty (n=63). pravastatin vs. placebo was evaluated on acetylcholine induced change in mean arterial diameter in the dilated segment and an angiographically normal segment (p=0.09). Three months of pravastatin did not significantly affect the vascular response to acetylcholine in either dilated coronary segments (p=0.09) or non-dilated sites compared to placebo.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: