Key result
Review summarizes ECG changes, functional impacts, and treatments to improve Salmonella myocarditis diagnosis and management.
This review highlights the under-recognized clinical entity of Salmonella myocarditis, emphasizing the need for clinical suspicion and awareness of associated electrocardiographic changes.
Alerts clinicians to Salmonella myocarditis in unexplained cases; leaves open prospective validation of ECG patterns and therapies.
Salmonella myocarditis has been a case of medical underestimation in terms of the occurrence, identification, and treatment decision for most patients. One prominent reason is the lack of significant scientific literature or reports highlighting the same. In addition, most often the complications associated are not exclusively limited to myocardiac infection and thus end up being neglected or undiagnosed. Cases of virus-induced myocardiac infection and the virus-mediated exacerbation are well realized in our scientific community, but the case is not same for bacteria-related myocardiac infection. Rarity of bacteriological myocardiac infection and the lack of prompt and first hand medical suspicion have led to this consistent medical negligence, ultimately resulting in further complications. In this review, we discuss about the case histories of Salmonella myocarditis and the existing treatment options. This review also tries to summarize the most common observed electrocardiographic and functional changes noted in cases of Salmonella myocarditis, to enable clinicians be updated with various markers for suspicion of Salmonella-triggered infection and ultimately resulting in improved clinical diagnosis and treatment.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
A 2016 study conducted a review in Salmonella myocarditis. Salmonella infection was evaluated. This review summarizes case histories, treatment options, and common electrocardiographic and functional changes in Salmonella myocarditis to improve clinical diagnosis and treatment.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: