Key result
Stent implantation did not reduce angiographic restenosis at 6 months compared with standard balloon angioplasty in small coronary arteries.
Why the study?
Does stent implantation reduce angiographic restenosis compared to standard balloon angioplasty in symptomatic patients with small coronary arteries (2.3-2.9 mm)?
RCT (n=351)
Does stent implantation reduce angiographic restenosis compared to standard balloon angioplasty in symptomatic patients with small coronary arteries (2.3-2.9 mm)?
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Stenting and standard balloon angioplasty yield similar angiographic restenosis rates at 6 months in small coronary arteries, though stenting may have a trend toward fewer in-hospital complications.
BACKGROUND: Lesions in small-diameter vessels (<3 mm) define a group with distinct clinical and morphological characteristics. There is an inverse relationship between vessel size and angiographic restenosis rate. This study assessed whether stents reduce angiographic restenosis in small coronary arteries compared with standard balloon angioplasty. METHODS AND RESULTS: We randomly assigned 351 symptomatic patients needing dilatation of 1 native coronary vessel between 2.3 and 2.9 mm in size to angioplasty alone (n=182) or stent implantation (n=169). The primary end point was angiographic restenosis at 6 months. Secondary end points included death, myocardial infarction, bypass surgery, and target vessel revascularization in hospital and at 6 months. There were no significant differences between groups in terms of major in-hospital complications. There was a trend toward fewer in-hospital events in the stent group (3% versus 7.1% in angioplasty group, P=0.076). Crossovers to stent occurred in 37 patients (20.3%). Repeat angiography at 6-month follow-up was performed in 85.3% of patients. Angiographic restenosis occurred in 28% of the stent group and 32.9% of the angioplasty group (P=0.36). Target vessel revascularization was required in 17.8% versus 20.3% of patients (P=0.54), respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Stenting and standard coronary angioplasty are associated with equal restenosis rate in small coronary arteries. With a lower in-hospital complication rate, stenting may be a superior strategy in small vessels.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Doucet et al. (2001) conducted an RCT in Coronary artery disease in small vessels (n=351). Stent implantation vs. Standard balloon angioplasty was evaluated on Angiographic restenosis at 6 months (p=0.36). Stent implantation did not reduce angiographic restenosis at 6 months compared with standard balloon angioplasty in small coronary arteries.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: