Key result
Anterior leaflet prolapse is linked to ~300% higher odds of residual MR after repair vs posterior prolapse.
Why the study?
Does anterior leaflet prolapse increase the risk of residual mitral regurgitation compared to posterior leaflet prolapse in patients undergoing mitral valve repair for mitral valve prolapse?
Cohort (n=70)
No
Does anterior leaflet prolapse increase the risk of residual mitral regurgitation compared to posterior leaflet prolapse in patients undergoing mitral valve repair for mitral valve prolapse?
Anterior leaflet prolapse is associated with a significantly higher risk of minor residual mitral regurgitation immediately after mitral valve repair compared to posterior leaflet prolapse.
Background Repair of anterior leaflet prolapse is technically more challenging and this might influence outcomes as compared to the repair of posterior leaflet prolapse in patients undergoing surgical correction of mitral regurgitation. We investigated the association of anterior leaflet prolapse with minor residual mitral regurgitation (MR) in patients with mitral valve prolapse (MVP) who underwent valve repair. Methods Eligible for this study were consecutive patients with severe MR due to MVP, who underwent mitral valve repair with residual MR by postpump transesophageal echocardiography ≤2+ during a 20-month period at Pasquinucci Hospital, Massa. Patients undergoing other cardiovascular surgical interventions were excluded. Two groups were defined according to the involvement of mitral valve leaflets: group 1, consisting of patients with anterior leaflet prolapse (isolated or not); and group 2, consisting of patients with isolated posterior leaflet prolapse. Results A total of 70 patients (18 in group 1 and 52 in group 2) were analyzed. Patients in group 2 were younger than those in group 1, but the difference was not significant (P = 0.052). There were no significant differences between the 2 study groups with respect to other variables. The proportion of patients with residual MR 1+/2+ was higher in group 1 than in group 2 (61.1% vs. 32.7%, respectively; P = 0.034). In a logistic regression model, anterior leaflet prolapse was an independent predictor of residual MR 1+/2+ (odds ratio, 4.0; 95% confidence interval, 1.14 to 14.04; P = 0.03). Conclusion In our study population, patients with anterior leaflet prolapse had a higher proportion of residual MR 1+/2+ as compared to those with posterior leaflet prolapse after repair of mitral valve.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Sulcaj et al. (2009) conducted a cohort in Severe mitral regurgitation due to mitral valve prolapse (n=70). Anterior leaflet prolapse vs. Isolated posterior leaflet prolapse was evaluated on Residual mitral regurgitation 1+/2+ (OR 4.0, 95% CI 1.14 to 14.04, p=0.03). Anterior leaflet prolapse was an independent predictor of residual mitral regurgitation 1+/2+ after mitral valve repair compared to posterior leaflet prolapse (OR 4.0).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: