Key result
Magnetic resonance imaging demonstrated a clear temporal dissociation between rapid clinical-biochemical healing and much slower anatomical recovery in a patient with spinning-induced rhabdomyolysis.
Why the study?
Does MRI reveal a temporal dissociation between anatomical recovery and clinical-biochemical healing in a patient with spinning-induced rhabdomyolysis?
Population
1 patient with spinning-induced exertional rhabdomyolysis in Italy
Comparison
Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) monitoring vs Clinical and biochemical monitoring
Design
Case_report
Authors
Loading...
Clinical-biochemical recovery may outpace anatomical healing on MRI in rhabdomyolysis; leaves open whether imaging should guide activity resumption.
Case Report (n=1)
No
Does MRI reveal a temporal dissociation between anatomical recovery and clinical-biochemical healing in a patient with spinning-induced rhabdomyolysis?
MRI demonstrates that anatomical recovery from spinning-induced rhabdomyolysis lags significantly behind clinical and biochemical normalization, which may help guide the safe timing for exercise resumption.
Pier Giorgio Rabitti (2011) conducted a case report in Spinning-induced rhabdomyolysis (n=1). Spinning was evaluated on Anatomical recovery on MRI compared to clinical and biochemical healing. Magnetic resonance imaging demonstrated a clear temporal dissociation between rapid clinical-biochemical healing and much slower anatomical recovery in a patient with spinning-induced rhabdomyolysis.
Synapse has enriched 3 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: