Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
CO 2 foam can control the CO 2 mobility and improve the sweep efficiency in reservoirs; however, CO 2 foam stabilized solely by surfactants is not stable. Nanoparticles can improve the performance of CO 2 foam. The synergistic effect of SiO 2 nanoparticles and sodium dodecyl sulfate (SDS) on the CO 2 foam stability was studied in this paper. The experimental results show that the synergistic effect requires an SDS/SiO 2 concentration ratio of 0.1–0.4. The strength of the effect increases as the SDS/SiO 2 concentration ratio increases from 0.1 to 0.17 but then decreases as the ratio further increases from 0.17 to 0.4; thus, a ratio of 0.17 provides the best performance for CO 2 foam. The mechanisms of the synergistic effect of SDS and SiO 2 include modulating the position of nanoparticle adsorption on the CO 2 and liquid interface, improving the interfacial properties of the CO 2 foam, and reducing its liquid discharge and coarsening. SiO 2 nanoparticles can also improve the CO 2 foam performance under high temperatures and pressures. The visual flooding experiment reveals that the addition of SiO 2 nanoparticles can improve the stability of CO 2 foam in porous media and shows good tolerance of crude oil. SDS/SiO 2 foam can increase the pressure differences of the flow in sandpacks after water flooding and improve the oil recoveries markedly. As the SDS/SiO 2 concentration ratio increases, the pressure differences and enhanced oil recovery first increase and then decrease. The best CO 2 foam flooding performance is achieved at an SDS/SiO 2 concentration ratio of 0.17, which is related to the CO 2 foam stability. The experimental results provide theoretical support for improving CO 2 foam flooding under reservoir conditions.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Li et al. (2016) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: