Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Three studies were conducted to elucidate the nature of creativity, as defined by scores on a personality questionnaire. In Study I ( N = 231) a cluster analysis suggested two important components for highly creative Ss: a bipolar cluster of personal vs impersonal competence, and an adventurousness cluster. In Study II ( N = 160) it was predicted and found that Ss who were personally competent would respond more on a verbal conditioning task if E preceded the conditioning with a friendly (socially enhanced) interaction, while impersonally treated but competent Ss conditioned better in a skill than in a chance condition. In Study III ( N = 62) adventurous Ss took more risks in two different classroom investigations. Additional findings are presented which suggest errors in previous conceptualizations of creativity.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Russell Eisenman (1969) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: