Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
A Cu metal‐organic framework (MOF), [Cu 4 (PMTD) 2 (H 2 O) 3 ] ⋅ 20 H 2 O, 1 , (where PMTD is 1,4‐phenylenebis(5‐methyl‐4 H ‐1,2,4‐triazole‐3,4‐diyl)bis(5‐carboxylato‐3,1‐phenylene)bis(hydroperoxymethanide)), with a rare chiral O h ‐type cage, and dual functionalities of open metal sites and Lewis basic sites, based on a designed U‐shaped ligand, was synthesized by hydrothermal methods. It exhibits high CO 2 , C 2 , and C 3 hydrocarbon storage capacity under atmospheric pressure, as well as high H 2 (1.96 wt.%) adsorption capacity at 77 K. Methane purification capacity was tested and verified step by step. Isosteric heats ( Q st ) studies reveal that CH 4 has the weakest van der Waals host–guest interactions among the seven gases at 298 K. Ideal adsorbed solution theory (IAST) calculation reveals that compound 1 is more selective toward CO 2 , C 2 H 6 , and C 3 H 8 over CH 4 in further calculating its separation capacity, as exemplified for CO 2 /CH 4 (50:50, 5:95), C 2 H 6 /CH 4 (50:50, 5:95), or C 3 H 8 /CH 4 (50:50, 5:95) binary gas mixtures. Breakthrough experiments show that 1 has a significantly higher adsorption capacity for CO 2 , C 2 H 6 , and C 3 H 8 than CH 4 . The selective adsorption properties of 1 make it a promising candidate for methane purification.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Meng et al. (2018) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: