Key result
Sodium replacement fails to cause expected hyperpolarization in ventricular cells due to altered iK1 gating.
Sodium removal does not lead to expected hyperpolarization in ventricular cells because sodium regulates the inward rectifier current iK1, masking changes in the sodium background current.
Should not alter clinical assumptions on Na+ and ventricular potential; leaves open iK1 modulation mechanisms for human validation.
It has recently been shown that a sodium background current, ib,Na, exists in cardiac muscle cells whose effect is to depolarize the membrane so that the resting potential, Vm, is positive to the potassium equilibrium potential, EK. In ventricular cells, where ib,Na is smallest, Vm is about 10 mV positive to EK (EK = -87 mV at 37 degrees C). Yet, replacement of Na+ ions by large impermeant cations does not cause the expected hyperpolarization. We have studied this problem in guinea-pig myocytes using a single microelectrode recording technique in combination with a rapid external solution switch. Cells depolarized < or = 0.5 mV from potentials between -80 and -73 mV and hyperpolarized up to 5 mV from potentials between -73 and -64 mV when 70 mM choline chloride or N-methyl-D-glucamine chloride were used to replace 70 mM Na+ in the bathing solution. Replacement by 70 mM lithium chloride, however, only caused hyperpolarization in very depolarized cells when the voltage change was much smaller. The changes were complete almost as soon as the solution change, i.e. within 250 ms, indicating that the actions are attributable to the external solution change rather than to secondary changes in intracellular concentrations. Patch clamp recording was used to investigate the mechanism involved. These experiments showed that the presence or absence of the inward rectifier current iK1 determines in which direction Na+ removal acts. In the absence of iK1 the changes are attributable to removal of ib,Na, whereas in the presence of iK1 the changes resemble the i(V) relation for iK1, implying that Na+ regulates iK1 in a way that can mask the changes in ib,Na. These results explain why removal of Na+ does not lead to hyperpolarization in ventricular cells as would be expected if changes in ib,Na were solely responsible. Computer reconstruction shows that the effects may be attributed to actions of sodium removal on the conductance and gating of iK1.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Spindler et al. (1998) studied Guinea-pig ventricular cells. Sodium substitution (replacement of Na+ by choline chloride, N-methyl-D-glucamine chloride, or lithium chloride) vs. Normal sodium bathing solution was evaluated on Changes in resting membrane potential and currents. In guinea-pig ventricular cells, sodium replacement does not cause expected hyperpolarization because sodium removal affects the conductance and gating of the inward rectifier current iK1.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: