Key result
High chest filling links to higher cardiac output, while low filling features increased peripheral resistance.
Why the study?
How do central haemodynamics and their oscillations change during a tilt test in healthy young men with different levels of blood filling of chest organs?
Population
143 healthy young men
Comparison
Tilt test vs Rest
Design
Cross-sectional
Authors
Loading...
Two distinct orthostatic adaptation strategies in healthy young men are hypothesis-generating; leaves open relevance to patients or clinical risk stratification.
Cross-Sectional (n=143)
How do central haemodynamics and their oscillations change during a tilt test in healthy young men with different levels of blood filling of chest organs?
p-value: p=<0.05
Healthy young men exhibit different hemodynamic adaptation strategies to tilt testing depending on their baseline level of chest organ blood filling.
Коваленко et al. (2009) conducted a cross-sectional in Healthy (n=143). Level of blood filling of chest organs vs. Different levels of blood filling (low, middle, high) was evaluated on Central haemodynamics and R-R interval duration (p=<0.05). Healthy young men exhibit two strategies of haemodynamic adaptation based on chest organ blood filling: high filling is associated with higher cardiac output and mean arterial pressure, whereas low filling is characterized by increased peripheral resistance.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: