Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
PulseExploreClubsResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeClubsExplore
September 1, 1997American Journal of Therapeutics

Digit Preferences Observed in the Measurement of Blood Pressure

View Full Paper
Ask AI
Bookmark
Share

Key result

Physician digit preference inflates apparent quinapril efficacy by ~16% when BP targets shift to ≤140/90.

  • n=667

Why the study?

Does digit preference in blood pressure measurement affect the apparent efficacy of antihypertensive treatment?

Population

667 adult patients 19-83 years of age with stage 1-3 hypertension, treated by 85 physicians in primary…

Design

Cohort, open

Follow-up

12 weeks

Authors

LALuis AlcocerMexican Social Security InstituteGNGermán NovoaInstituto de Investigación Biomédica de SalamancaDSDavid SotresIowa State University

Discussion

Loading...

Member takes

Implication

May bias apparent antihypertensive efficacy estimates; hypothesis-generating for standardized BP protocols in research.

Structured PICO

Does digit preference in blood pressure measurement affect the apparent efficacy of antihypertensive treatment?

P
Population
667 adult patients aged 19-83 years with stage 1-3 hypertension treated with quinapril for 12 weeks in primary health care.
I
Intervention
Quinapril for 12 weeks.
O
Outcome
Digit preference in blood pressure recording and its impact on apparent drug efficacy (normalization defined as SBP < 140 mm Hg and DBP < 90 mm Hg).surrogate

Physicians demonstrate a strong digit preference for multiples of 5 and 10 when recording blood pressure, which can significantly alter the perceived efficacy of antihypertensive treatments depending on the exact cutoff criteria used.

Cite This Study

Alcocer et al. (1997) studied stage 1-3 hypertension (n=667). Quinapril was evaluated on Blood pressure normalization (SBP < 140 mm Hg and DBP < 90 mm Hg). Physician digit preference in blood pressure measurement resulted in apparent quinapril efficacy increasing from 75.1% to 90.7% when normalization criteria were changed from <140/90 to ≤140/90 mm Hg.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6aa6ca22b3a9aaf5308e4cachttps://doi.org/10.1097/00045391-199709000-00005

Topics

Hypertension management
View Full Paper
Ask AI
Bookmark
Share

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Assessing the Blood Pressure–Lowering Efficacy of Antihypertensive Medications: Which Blood Pressures Should We Use?2009 · 2 citations
  2. 2Targeting Systolic Blood Pressure: The Key to Controlling Combined Systolic/Diastolic Hypertension2006 · 12 citations
  3. 3Response of Ambulatory Blood Pressure to Antihypertensive Therapy Guided by Clinic Pressure1993 · 31 citations
  4. 4Antihypertensive Treatment Based on Conventional or Ambulatory Blood Pressure Measurement1997 · 176 citations
  5. 5Reproducibility of home, ambulatory, and clinic blood pressure: implications for the design of trials for the assessment of antihypertensive drug efficacy2001 · 27 citations