Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
In silico security analysis demonstrates robust hardware accelerator protection using encrypted protein biometric signatures, indicating superior tamper tolerance and IP ownership proof.
This article proposes a robust encrypted protein molecular biometric signature-based hardware security approach to secure hardware accelerators (like digital signal processing (DSP) and multimedia intellectual property (IP) cores) against threats of piracy/IP counterfeiting and ownership abuse. In the proposed approach, protein molecular biometric signature is formulated by taking the protein sequence of 20 different unique amino acid combinations from human body protein sample, followed by robust encryption using facial biometric key and encodings. This IP vendor’s encrypted protein molecular biometric signature is then subsequently converted into its corresponding digital proof, followed by embedding into the design as a covert protein molecular signature security constraint, thus producing a secured hardware accelerator design. The proposed approach is more robust than recent hardware security approaches proposed in the literature in terms of stronger proof of ownership (authorship) as well as tamper tolerance (TT) ability. The results present the following analysis of the proposed protein molecular biometric signature approach: 1) very low probability of coincidence (Pc) metric (signifying strength of digital proof) for different DSP hardware accelerators in the range of 3.40E-13–6.33E-2 and 2) stronger TT ability in the range of 5.39E + 67–1.0E + 421 for different DSP hardware accelerators.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Sengupta et al. (2023) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: