Case-control study reveals altered peripheral RNA m6A methylation and gene expression in major depressive disorder, indicating potential biomarkers and metabolic pathway dysregulation.
Objective To systematically characterize the epitranscriptomic landscape of N 6 -methyladenosine (m 6 A) methylation in major depressive disorder (MDD) and elucidate its functional consequences on mRNA and lncRNA regulation. Methods We performed comprehensive m 6 A methylome profiling using microarray analysis of peripheral blood samples from first-episode, treatment-naïve MDD patients (n = 4) and matched healthy controls (n = 4). Differentially methylated RNAs were identified through stringent criteria (fold-change ≥1.5, probability value (p) < 0.05), followed by integrated bioinformatics analyses including Gene Ontology (GO) and Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes (KEGG) pathway analysis. Validation of selected RNAs ( GRM4, CAMKK2, TTC28-AS1 , and PAX8-AS1 ) was performed using MeRIP-qPCR in 15 MDD patients and 15 controls. Results Significant differences in m 6 A methylation of mRNAs and lncRNAs were observed between MDD patients and healthy controls. 513 mRNAs (180 hypermethylated, 333 hypomethylated) and 119 lncRNAs (58 hypermethylated, 61 hypomethylated) showed differential m 6 A modifications. GO and KEGG analyses revealed that hypermethylated mRNAs were mainly involved in neuroactive ligand-receptor interactions, while hypomethylated mRNAs were associated with the AMPK signaling pathway. Among the 350 differentially expressed mRNAs, 171 were upregulated and 179 downregulated, enriched in cAMP and TNF signaling pathways, respectively. Among 110 differentially expressed lncRNAs, 71 were upregulated and 39 downregulated. Validation confirmed significant m 6 A methylation differences in GRM4 (p < 0.001), CAMKK2 (p = 0.012), and PAX8-AS1 (p = 0.006), but not significantly different in TTC28-AS1 . Conclusion Our findings suggest that peripheral m 6 A methylation signatures are associated with MDD pathophysiology, with GRM4 and PAX8-AS1 representing promising candidate biomarkers, while the AMPK and neuroactive ligand-receptor pathways provide hypothesis-generating avenues for future mechanistic investigation.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Liu et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: