This is the authors' abstract. We don't add key points for this paper.
Strengthening effect by microalloyed vanadium (V) on eutectoid pearlite steel has been investigated from the perspective of nano-precipitation and lattice strain. 0.2% proof stress of specimens, isothermally transformed at 873 K, increases around 160-170 MPa with 0.1% V addition. However, interphase precipitation of vanadium carbide (VC), regarded as the principal strengthening factor, has not been detected by transmission electron microscopy or 3D atom probe microscopy (3D-AP). On the other hand, lattice strain in lamellar ferrite, analyzed by broadening of X-ray diffraction peak, has clear correlation with proof stress. The lattice strain data of 0.1% V added pearlite specimens are plotted on the same correlation line as of V free ones. In addition, elemental map by 3D-AP shows that vanadium atoms concentrate in lamellar cementite rather than ferrite, which could change cementite lattice parameters and gain ferrite/cementite misfit causing lattice strain increment. These results reveal that microalloyed V influences not only precipitation of VC in lamellar ferrite, but also the lattice strain increment in pearlite lamellar. As far as pearlite steels containing at most 0.1% V, lattice strain is considered to be the major factor of their yield behaviors. Furthermore, 0.1% V addition has not enhanced work-hardening behavior as notably as estimated by Ashby’s work-hardening theory of dispersion-hardened crystals. Therefore, VC precipitation should not necessary for V strengthening effect on pearlite steel.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Maejima et al. (2018) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: